2013高考英语（书面表达）限时训练（13）经典名句与句式汇总
第二节 书面表达：（25分）
假如你是一名高三学生，经常为看电视的事跟妈妈闹意见，今天你跟妈妈达成一致。请根据以下表格的内容，以 An Argument 为题为《英语广场》写一篇100字左右的英语短文。
母亲
儿子
高三学生学习任务重， 看电视浪费时间
学习一天很疲劳，看电视可以放松一下
儿子自制力差，看电视会影响视力
看电视也可以增长知识，了解国际国内大事，紧跟时代
星期中不准我看电视，但在周末允许我看新闻、文艺、体育或科普类节目
注意：1、短文的开头已给出，不记入总词数。
2、不要表格中的内容，但不要逐翻译。
3、可以适当增添合乎情理的过渡性语言。
I am a Senior 3 student. I often quarrel with my mother over whether I can watch TV after school. My mother holds the view that students in Senior 3, heavily burdened with their studies, are too busy to spare any time to watch TV. It seems to her that once I am allowed to do that I will not be able to control myself and forget all about my study. She also thinks that it is bad for my eyes to watch TV too often. But I really can’t accept her ideas. I think it is relaxing to watch TV after a day’s hard work.. Not only can it set my mind at rest, but it can broaden my horizons. Now we have at last reached an agreement that I can only watch TV at weekends, and the programs should be limited to news and programs of entertainment, sports or science
*********************************************************结束
2
第二节：书面表达（满分25分）
假如你叫王丽,是一位高中生。请你用英语给报社写一封信，反映如下情况并谈谈你的的想法：
现在有很多学生使用手机一是认为这是种时髦二是认为便于跟家人和朋友联系。
一些学生把手机带进教室，在课堂上经常听见手机的铃声。破坏课堂纪律。
有的同学还在课堂上发短信息，浪费宝贵的时间。
建议：教室是学习的地方，需要安静；学生不应该在教室中使用手机；应该集中注意力学习。(附：自己再想一条建议)
注意：
信的开头和结尾已给出；
字数: 100 左右
参考词汇 :集中(注意力) concentrate on
Dear Editor ,
I’m a senior high student .
书面表达:
Dear Editor,
I’m a senior high student. Now many students use mobile phones .They think it’s a fashion to use mobile phones .Besides ,it’s very convenient to get in touch with their families and friends by using mobile phones. But some students break the rules in class. They bring their mobile phones to the classroom and we often hear the ring of mobile phones in class. Some of them even waste precious time in class typing short messages on the mobile phones .
In my opinion ,the classroom is a place for students to gain knowledge .Therefore quietness is badly needed for us to learn our lessons .Those with mobile phones shouldn’t take mobile phones to the classroom . We are supposed to concentrate on our studies. The school should make a rule to forbid the students to use mobile phones in the classroom.
Yours sincerely
Wang Li
************************************************************结束
逻辑问题分析论证句式
The mere fact that ticket sales in recent years for screenplay-based movies have exceeded those for book-based movies is insufficient evidence to conclude that writing screenplays now provides greater financial opportunity for writers.
It is possible that fees paid by movie studios for screenplays will decrease in the future relative to those for book rights.
The argument fails to rule out the possibility that a writer engage in both types of writing as well as other types.
In any event, the advertisement provides no justification for the mutually exclusive choice that it imposes on the writer.
The argument simply equates success with movie ticket sales, which is unwarranted.
The author assumes that physical capabilities are the only attributes necessary to operate a motor vehicle.
Moreover, the author provides no evidence that the realism of color photography is the reason for its predominance.
This assumption presents a false dilemma, since the two media are not necessarily mutually exclusive alternatives.
Common sense tells us that a photographer can succeed by working in both media.
The argument ignores the factors - such as initiative, creativity, technical skills, and business judgment - that may be more important than the choice of medium in determining success in photography.
The major problem with the argument is that the stated similarities between Company A and B are insufficient to support the conclusion that Company A will suffer a fate similar to Company B's.
Consequently, the mere fact that Company A holds a large share of the video - game hardware and software market does not support the claim that Company A will also fail.
Thus, the author unfairly assumes that highly - rated public television programs are necessarily widely viewed, or popular.
While this may be true in some cases, it is equally possible that only companies with products that are already best - sellers can afford the higher ad rates that popular shows demand.
Admittedly, the vice president's reasoning linking employee benefits with company profits seems reasonable on the surface.
One can infer from the survey's results that a full one - third of the respondents may have viewed the current benefits package unfavorably.
Lacking more specific information about how these other employees responded, it is impossible to assess the reliability of the survey's results or to make an informed recommendation.
It is unlikely that the brief one - week periods under comparison are representative of longer time periods.
If so, even though 3 percent more accidents occurred after the change, the author's argument that changing the speed limit increases danger for drivers would be seriously weakened.
The editorial fails to take into account possible differences between East and West Cambria that are relevant to how drivers react to speed - limit changes.
In addition, while it is true that many voters change their minds several times before voting, and that some remain undecided until entering the voting booth, this is not true of everyone.
Without knowing the extent and nature of the damage resulting from the bad publicity or the reason for the violation, we cannot accept the author's conclusion.
The author's proposal is inconsistent with the author's conclusion about the consequences of adopting an ethics code.
To begin with, the author fails to consider health threats posed by incinerating trash.
The author's conclusion that switching to incineration would be more salutary for public health would be seriously undermined.
However, this is not necessarily the case.
The author's implicit claim that incinerators are economically advantageous to landfills is poorly supported.
Consequently, unless the author can demonstrate that the city will incur expenses that are not covered by the increased revenues from these projects, the author's concern about these issues is unfounded.
First of all, while asserting that real incomes are rising, the author provides no evidence to support this assertion.
But no evidence is provided to show that this explanation is correct.
Moreover, the author fails to consider and rule out other factors that might account for proportional decreases in spending on food.
The author ignores other likely benefits of agricultural technology that affect food pieces only indirectly or not at all.
In the first place, a great deal of empirical evidence shows that sequels are often not as profitable as the original movie.
However, unless the original cast and production team are involved in making the sequel, there is a good chance it will not be financially successful.
Since the difficulties inherent in this process make it hard to predict whether the result will be a success or a failure, the conclusion that the sequel will be profitable is presumptuous(武断的)
This assumption overlooks other criteria for determining a bridge's importance - such as the number of commuters using the bridge, the role of the bridge in local emergencies and disasters, and the impact that bridge closure would have on the economies of nearby cities.
Without such evidence, we cannot accept the author's conclusion that no government funds should be directed toward maintaining the Styx River bridge.
The fact that the nearby city has a weakening economy does not prove that the city will not contribute significantly to tax revenues.
Substantiating this assumption requires examining the proper duty of government.
Accordingly, this assumption is simply an unproven claim.
The author is presenting a false dilemma by imposing an either - or choice between two courses of action that need not be mutually exclusive.
It is equally possible that legislators can address both areas of concern concurrently.
The argument relies on the assumption that the legislators in question(所讨论的)have the opportunity to address urban crime problems.
Finally, the author unfairly trivializes the severity of rural crime by simply comparing it with urban crime.
It is possible that the sales trend in a particular location is not representative of sales in other regions.
However, the author fails to acknowledge and rule out other possible causes of such accidents.
A third problem with the argument is that the statistical evidence upon which it relies is too vague to be informative.
If the subjects for the study were randomly chosen and represent a diverse cross section of the population of shampoo users, the results will be reliable regardless of the number of participants.
Experience alone is far from being enough to guarantee minimized processing costs.
Given that Olympic Foods does benefit from lowered processing costs due to its years of experience, the prediction about maximum profits is still in lake of solid ground.
************************************************************结束
【点此下载】